Stalking Points Investigation: Creating an Enemy

I’m glad to have read David Brook’s clear, point-by-point defense of someone in the Benghazi issue. I feel the constant charges and the digging for one more misrepresentation have one goal–to prove that Obama himself (or at least Clinton) was behind substantive changes to the released talking points. It doesn’t seem to matter who blocked or denied funding for more security, or what other choices led to American vulnerability in Benghazi. And it doesn’t seem to matter what understandable and acceptable motives might have led to changes to the points. The investigation seems more to find a word and an author of that word who can be attacked as cold, uncaring, and an enemy of the state. The investigators have an author or two in mind.

I hate war and its cost in human lives lost and ruined. I would welcome and support research that lessens any of that cost. The talking points investigation, though, seems niggling and ugly.

(This is a revised version of my comment on David Brook’s editorial, New York Times, May 14, 2013. This is reposted from


About rmkinder

This entry was posted in Politics, Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Stalking Points Investigation: Creating an Enemy

  1. People love to spend more time hunting the bad guy to lynch than they ever want to spend finding a solution to the problem. Such a waste of time. Like anyone would have done it differently if they had had the prescience that something would happen as it did. Hindsight is always 20-20 and people are always out for someone else’s blood.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s